Discovery Application
What value have we added to
students undergraduate experience?
What value have we added to Human
Sciences professional foundations? Knowledge base?
What value have we added to Human
Sciences faculty?
What value have we added to the
universitys intellectual community?
What value have we added to
academe?
- First assess the URC (See Vision
statements to determine whats being evaluated)
- Assess models, assess
products,
- Level of participation in
URC?
- Assess the various undergraduate
research models
- What difference did it make?
- What was the impact of this
experience on the individual? In essence what was the quality of the
undergraduate experience?
- Impact on Human Sciences
- What is the impact on human
capacity development? i.e. federal agencies
Clarify vision for the future:
- The vision for the assessment
committee is to see individual units build assessment into each model (campus
efforts).
- URC provides models/rubrics for
assessment for units.
- Data gains/national
recognition. Setting the pace for undergraduate research in Human
Sciences (i.e. front/back page of the Chronicle of Higher Education)
- Growth measure progression from
benchmark
- Increase the number of students
submitting and presenting at professional associations
- Increase participation
- Increase in quality of
participating units
- Effectiveness of models to fit
institutional culture(administrative structure, size of the school, mission,
land-grant, funding, student mix, public or private).
Identify steps toward vision:
Assessment Advisory Body
Accountability/Value Added
|
Benchmarking
|
Systems-Mechanics of Execution
|
Models
|
- Stated outcomes
- Components of the
vision/mission
- Define reciprocity between URC
& units
- Re: responsibility reporting
|
- Who/what/how much
monitoring-update linking w/existing data (FAEIS)
- Inventory components:
students submissions, publications, faculty presentations, course
engagement/document (# / %)
- Graduate school attendance (# of
students attending graduate school)
- Assess faculty development
|
- Set priorities
- Data evidence-collect, analyze,
report, feedback, disseminate
- Information systems
- Storage retrieval
- Cataloging of undergraduate
research.
- Collaboration :
- Faculty- to -student
- Student- to- student
|
- Personnel & funding
incentive
- Venue for student
presentation
- Collaboration-multi-state
(inter-intra)
- Integrative
research/development/engagement
- Description of workable models
and commonalities
- Assessment of faculty
development, best practices
- Workable models
|
Assess:
|
URC Mission & Vision
Models
Products/Outcomes
|
- By asking these questions: 1,
2,3,4,5 (see grid block above)
- Set priorities, benchmark
(AERA)
- Need
resources/grant/funding
- 3rd party/data
collection
- Personnel (3-5)
- Structure to advise
Commit to initial
actions:
- Inform central administration of
URC participation
- Measure benchmarks of non-URC
institutions vs. URC participants
- Continue task force or form a new
task force concurrently with other initiatives
- Search out funding sources
- Create and monitor types of
recognition
- Create opportunities for public
relations (value)
- Define research for
undergraduates- permeantation of scientific method
Follow-up Committee Point
Person:
- New personnel hired to implement
activities of the URC or the task force.
Brainstorm Notes:
|
Stated outcomes
Benchmarks
Components of vision
Data evidence
Multiple measures: Collect, analyze,
report-disseminate, feedback)
System for collecting data
Set priorities
Accountability
Personnel funding
Incentives
Link with FAEIS and others (i.e.
Link with Food & Nutrition Summer Institute for Historically Black
Colleges)
Integrative
research/development
Engagement
|
Report to URC units re:
responsibilities
Benchmark/Inventory
- Number of students participating (%
of units)
- Number of faculty participating
- Number of courses being offered in
participating institutions
- Number of
presentation/publications/submissions
Update engagement-
Popular Press or peer review
- Description of workable
models
- Commonalities of models
Information systems
Storage & retrieval
system
Assessment faculty
development
Tenure Promotion & D
process- faculty
January 25, 2001
|